הַתּוֹלֵשׁ סִימָנֵי טֻמְאָה בֵּין כֻּלָּן בֵּין מִקְצָתָן. אוֹ הִכְוָה אֶת הַמִּחְיָה כֻּלָּהּ אוֹ מִקְּצָתָהּ. אוֹ הַקּוֹצֵץ הַנֶּגַע כֻּלּוֹ מִבְּשָׂרוֹ אוֹ מִן הַבֶּגֶד אוֹ מִן הַבַּיִת. בֵּין קֹדֶם שֶׁיָּבוֹא לַכֹּהֵן בֵּין בְּתוֹךְ הֶסְגֵּר אוֹ בְּתוֹךְ הֶחְלֵט אוֹ אַחַר הַפִּטּוּר הֲרֵי זֶה עוֹבֵר בְּלֹא תַּעֲשֶׂה שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (דברים כד ח) "הִשָּׁמֶר בְּנֶגַע הַצָּרַעַת לִשְׁמֹר מְאֹד וְלַעֲשׂוֹת כְּכל אֲשֶׁר יוֹרוּ אֶתְכֶם הַכֹּהֲנִים הַלְוִיִּם כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוִּיתִם", תִּשְׁמְרוּ שֶׁלֹּא יִתְלֹשׁ אוֹ שֶׁיָּקֹץ. אֲבָל אֵינוֹ לוֹקֶה עַד שֶׁיּוֹעִילוּ מַעֲשָׂיו וְאִם לֹא הוֹעִילוּ אֵינוֹ לוֹקֶה. כֵּיצַד. הָיְתָה בּוֹ בַּהֶרֶת וּבָהּ שָׁלֹשׁ שְׂעָרוֹת לְבָנוֹת וְתָלַשׁ אַחַת. כָּוָה מִקְצָת הַמִּחְיָה וְנִשְׁאַר מִמֶּנָּה כַּעֲדָשָׁה. אֵינוֹ לוֹקֶה שֶׁהֲרֵי הוּא טָמֵא כְּשֶׁהָיָה. וְכֵן כָּל כַּיּוֹצֵא בָּזֶה. וּמַכִּין אוֹתוֹ מַכַּת מַרְדּוּת. וְכֵן הַמְגַלֵּחַ אֶת הַנֶּתֶק לוֹקֶה שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (ויקרא יג לג) "וְאֶת הַנֶּתֶק לֹא יְגַלֵּחַ". וְאֵינוֹ חַיָּב עַד שֶׁיְּגַלֵּחַ כָּל הַנֶּתֶק בְּתַעַר. וּמֻתָּר לִמְצֹרָע לִשָּׂא בְּמוֹט עַל כְּתֵפוֹ שֶׁיֵּשׁ בָּהּ הַצָּרַעַת וְלִקְשֹׁר הַסִּיב עַל רַגְלוֹ וְאִם הָלְכוּ סִימָנֵי טֻמְאָה יֵלְכוּ וְהוּא שֶׁלֹּא נִתְכַּוֵּן לְכָךְ:
A person who removes the signs of impurity, whether all of them or part of them, or who burns the healthy flesh in a baheret, whether partially or entirely, or who removes an entire blemish from his flesh, a garment, or a building, violates a negative commandment, as Deuteronomy 24:8 states: "Be very careful with regard to a tzara'at blemish, to watch it carefully, and to act according to everything that the priest, the Levites, will instruct you, as you were commanded, you shall heed." Implied is that one should not remove hair nor cut off any sign. This applies before the priest comes for an initial examination, after the person has been isolated, after he has been deemed definitively impure, or after he has been sent away as pure. He is not, however, liable for lashes unless his acts are effective. If his acts are not effective, he is not liable for lashes. What is implied? If a person had a baheret with three white hairs and he pulled out one or he burnt a portion of the healthy flesh in a baheret, but a lentil-sized portion remained, he is not liable for lashes, because he is impure, as was his status previously. Similar laws apply in all analogous situations. He is, however, given stripes for rebellious conduct. Similarly, one who shaves the hairs next to a netek is liable for lashes, as Leviticus 13:33 states: "He shall not shave the netek." He is not liable unless he shaves the entire area around the netek with a razor. It is permitted for a person afflicted with tzara'at to carry a pole on his shoulder on which there is a tzara'at blemish or to tie palm bast on his foot on which there is a blemish. If the signs of impurity are removed, they are removed, provided he does not have the intent of removing them.
