6קְטַנָּה שֶׁלֹּא מֵאֲנָה וְהִגְדִּילָה וְאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁלֹּא בְּעָלָהּ בַּעְלָהּ מִשֶּׁנַּעֲשֵׂית בַּת שְׁתֵּים עֶשְׂרֵה שָׁנָה וְיוֹם אֶחָד הֲרֵי זוֹ אֵינָהּ מְמָאֶנֶת שֶׁהֲרֵי הִגְדִּילָה. וּצְרִיכָה גֵּט מִדִּבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים שֶׁהֲרֵי לֹא בָּא עָלֶיהָ אַחַר שֶׁהִגִּיעָה לִשְׁנֵי נַעֲרוּת עַד שֶׁנָּחוּשׁ לָהּ שֶׁמָּא הֵבִיאָה סִימָנִין וְתִהְיֶה סָפֵק מְקֻדֶּשֶׁת, וְלֹא בָּא עָלֶיהָ אַחַר שֶׁהִגְדִּילָה כְּדֵי שֶׁתִּהְיֶה אֵשֶׁת אִישׁ גְּמוּרָה. וְנִמְצֵאת שֶׁאֵינָהּ צְרִיכָה גֵּט אֶלָּא מִנִּשּׂוּאֵי קַטְנוּת שֶׁהֵן מִדִּבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים. לְפִיכָךְ אִם עָמְדָה וְנִתְקַדְּשָׁה אַחַר שֶׁגָּדְלָה תּוֹפְסִין בָּהּ קִדּוּשִׁין שֶׁל שֵׁנִי. וְאִם גֵּרֵשׁ הָרִאשׁוֹן יִכְנֹס הַשֵּׁנִי. אֲבָל אִם גֵּרֵשׁ שֵׁנִי לֹא יְקַיֵּם רִאשׁוֹן שֶׁמָּא יֹאמְרוּ הֶחֱזִיר גְּרוּשָׁתוֹ מֵאַחַר שֶׁנִּתְאָרְסָה. וְאִם בָּא עָלֶיהָ שֵׁנִי קֹדֶם שֶׁיְּגָרֵשׁ רִאשׁוֹן תֵּצֵא מִזֶּה וּמִזֶּה מִפְּנֵי שֶׁדּוֹמֶה לְאִשָּׁה שֶׁשָּׁמְעָה שֶׁמֵּת בַּעְלָהּ וְנִשֵּׂאת וְאַחַר כָּךְ בָּא בַּעְלָהּ. וְאֵין הַוָּלָד מִן הַשֵּׁנִי מַמְזֵר. וְאִם בָּא עָלֶיהָ רִאשׁוֹן קֹדֶם שֶׁגֵּרֵשׁ שֵׁנִי הַוָּלָד מַמְזֵר:
When a minor does not exercise her right to mi'un and attains majority, she no longer has this privilege. [This applies] even when she did not engage in marital relations with her husband after reaching the age of twelve years and one day. Since she has attained majority, it is a Rabbinic decree that a divorce is required [if the marriage must be dissolved]. [The rationale for this ruling is as follows:] The couple did not engage in marital relations after she reached the age of na'arut, in which instance it would be necessary to suspect that she manifested signs of physical maturity, and accordinly, there would be a doubt whether or not a marriage bond had been established. Nor did they engage in relations after she attained majority, in which instance she would become a married woman in all regards. Accordingly, the only reason she requires a get is the fact of her marriage as a minor, which is a Rabbinic institution. Based on the above, if another man consecrated her after she attained majority, [when she had not engaged in marital relations with her first husband from the age of twelve onward,] the second man's consecration is binding. As such, if her first husband divorces her, her second husband may consummate the marriage. If, however, her second husband divorces her, her first husband may not continue his marriage with her. [This is a decree, instituted] lest people say: "He remarried his divorcee after she was consecrated." If her second husband engaged in marital relations with her before her first husband divorced her, she must be divorced by both men. [This is a decree instituted] because [the situation] resembles an instance in which a woman heard that her husband died, she married, and then her first husband returned. [The laws governing the two situations are not entirely analogous. In this instance,] a child fathered by the second husband is not illegitimate. But if her first husband engages in relations with her before her second husband divorces her, any child born is illegitimate.